Problem of Preconditions and Prospects of Armenian-Turkish Relations

Print Print Email Email

By Armen Ayvazyan

The glaring theoretical confusion and situational policy making by Republic of Armenia’s (RA) Foreign Ministry involve several vitally important areas, including:
• The actual degree of RA willingness to compromise in the settlement of the Artsakh conflict;
• The strategy of developing Armenia-Russia and Armenia-NATO relations;
• The proposed solutions and the contours of Armenian interests in Armenian-Georgian relations (including in the issue of Armenians of Javakhk);
• However, the uncertainties of RA foreign policy are especially evident in the inadequate positions towards Turkey. These positions, in our opinion, are the source of general lack of focus and purpose in RA foreign policy.
What’s more, the uncertainties of RA foreign policy in these areas are not clear either to the Armenian public or to the international community, albeit from a different perspective.
The new chapter of Armenian-Turkish conflict, with the absence of settlement, needs above all a correct political assessment and diagnosis. In this respect, it is worth examining the principle of preconditions put forth by Ankara in return for normalizing Armenian-Turkish relations on the one side, and the principle of dropping all preconditions by Yerevan on the other.
Let us examine these preconditions from several perspectives.
In terms of methodology, how productive is the Armenian side’s principle of normalizing relations without preconditions, when the Turkish side puts forth numerous and ever-changing preconditions? In our opinion, the Armenian side’s disavowal of any preconditions is wrong both theoretically and practically.
In practice, the last 17 years affirm that Armenia’s soft policy has not ensured any political gains. Meanwhile, Turkey has not been pressured or, better yet, condemned for imposing years of blockade and diplomatic pressure, unleashing full-scale informational and psychological warfare campaigns, threats and blackmail against Armenia in coordination with Azerbaijan. In the present conditions of Armenia’s submissive policy Turkey’s policy of putting forward preconditions has fully justified itself. Turkey would not have succeeded so much, if Armenia had put forth its own preconditions for normalizing relations. Theoretically, Armenia is construed as the role of the party who is guilty and conceding: after all, Yerevan does not demand anything, while the Turks present many demands. In terms of propaganda, by dropping preconditions Armenia has lost a wonderful opportunity to present and comprehensively explain the animosity of Turkey’s foreign policy and its full danger to regional peace and security. What’s more, the prolonged absence of an adequate assessment of Turkey’s policy has seriously confused the Armenian public as well, which is in no less need for explanations and clarifications than the international community.
In terms of diplomatic maneuvering, Yerevan’s expressed position for establishing relations without preconditions, including opening borders immediately, may cause maximum difficulties and problems, if Turkey agrees to it at any moment. This refers to the kind of economic and demographic assault, to which the Turks will resort and which Armenia is still not ready to withstand.
In terms of national security, without the proposal and fulfilment of certain preconditions of the Armenian side, the opening of Armenian-Turkish borders will quickly undermine Armenian Republic’s still nascent national security system. Yet Turkey will present this step as a significant concession on its part. In reality, Yerevan’s principle of abandonment of preconditions is nothing more than a policy of unjustified concessions, including in the issue of overcoming the consequences of the Genocide. Armenia is also conceding in the Artsakh problem, an integral issue of the Armenian Question, and does not link it with the problem of redressing the consequences of the Genocide.
And what should be the preconditions put forth by Armenia?
At first, rejection of hostile policy, including:
• Genocide recognition and condemnation as well as start of negotiations to redress its consequences;
• At a minimum, adoption of a neutral position towards the Artsakh conflict;
• Cessation of the informational-psychological warfare; and
• Elimination of the blockade.
In fact, these preconditions represent the essential confidence-building measures in any future realistic rapprochement between Armenia and Turkey. Without their fulfilment, the opening of borders and establishment of diplomatic relations not only will bring nothing good for Armenia, but will create a new and more complicated situation.
Unfortunately, instead of undergoing a re-evaluation, the RA foreign policy continues to consistently follow the direction that was chosen in the beginning of the 1990’s, but which leads to a dead-end.

Read in Armenian and Russian

—————–
[ * ] This report was first read on July 14th, 2008, at the “Principles of Foreign Policy of Armenia” seminar organized by the Civil Society and Regional Progress Institute. For media coverage of this speech, refer to Гаянэ Мовсесян, “Есть ли у Армении внешняя политика?”, Республика Армения, № 052 (621), 16 июля 2008 (http://blog.ararat-center.org/?p=60).

2 responses so far

2 Responses to “Problem of Preconditions and Prospects of Armenian-Turkish Relations”

  1. Bagradon 03 Oct 2008 at 9:56 am

    While President Sargsian’s latest initiatives (vis-à-vis Turkey) appear to be assertive in reality, precisely due to the lack or deficit of such assertiveness in Armenia’s foreign policy in general and a proper national-strategic assessment of all aspects of our possible developing relations with Turkey in particular (in all its dimensions from Turkey’s Genocide and hostility towards Armenia/ns, Artsakh, blockade, closed borders, etc.) Armenia’s position is terribly exposed due to the massive imbalance in the two countries “relations” without a prior shift in Turkey’s aggressive and hostile policy towards Armenia as evidenced by its continuing positions regarding the Genocide, amongst other things, as well as Armenia’s large and small open concessionary gestures.
    What is happening behind the scenes only God and the two establishments know!
    The terms of reference are heavily loaded in favour of Turkey and against Armenia given the latter’s unnecessary, even bizarre, concessions and Turkey’s continuing aggressive posture on all aspects of Turkish Armenian conflict.
    Opening of the border by Turkey or establishing relations far from being beneficial to Armenia are potentially disastrous without a radical shift in Turkey’s aggressive denialist policy (for better understanding of this simply compare Germany-Israel/Jewish relations, not forgetting the latter has no border or territorial component!!).

  2. Vartanon 06 Oct 2008 at 9:31 pm

    The lack of a national policy that guides Armenia in her dealings with her neighbors is very evident. Armenia is in urgent need for such a policy. It should then move in steps that are in accordance with such a national policy rather than move in whimsical, haphazardly incoherent steps that reveal the inexistence of such a policy.

    Such incoherent moves – that lack an overall strategy – result in causing more damage than providing benefits. A blatant example of such a damage was Armenia’s invitation to Turkey’s Gul to visit Armenia. In spite of Serge Sarkissian’s best intentions, Turkey had much more to gain from this invitation than Armenia who initiated it. That is the ONLY reason why Turkey accepted the invitation.

    Obviously, such a policy should take into consideration Armenia’s own national interests. In addition, it should be a comprehensive one that will take into consideration the whole “forest” rather than any individual “trees”. I mean it should take into consideration Armenia’s various interests not only in present day Armenia but also Armenia’s national interests in Artsakh, Javakhk, Nakhichevan and the occupied Eastern-Armenian provinces.

    Unfortunately, it seems that the Armenian government does not see the importance of such a policy and hence it has not allocated the necessary resources to come up with such a policy. However, the need is there and it is urgent and the task is a huge one.

    Armen, In my opinion such a policy will have to be established by you and nationalists like you. History has put a heavy load on your shoulders and on the shoulders of your nationalist colleagues. I am sure you can and you will rise to the challenge.

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Կայքի մոդերատորներն իրավունք ունեն հեռացնելու այն գրառումները, որոնք պարունակում են անձնական վիրավորանքներ, բռնության կոչեր, թեմայից դուրս գրառումներ, գովազդային նյութեր։ Նաև չի խրախուսվում շատախոսությունը (flood):

You must be logged in to post a comment.